WorldWide Drilling Resource

Notes from the Groundwater Guy by Thomas E. Ballard, P.G., C.H.G. Southeast Hydrogeology, PLLC Where is the Contaminant in My Well Coming from? I talked to the operator of a small water district in California several years ago about an issue they were having with arsenic in their main supply well. Water samples collected during nonpumping conditions, or just at startup of the pump, had arsenic concentrations which exceeded the Environmental Protection Agency’s Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL), but once the pump was operating for a period of time, the arsenic concentrations consistently dropped to below the MCL. He wanted to know the reason for the difference in arsenic concentrations during dif- ferent well states. The answer was actually quite straightforward: during nonpumping (ambient) conditions, water inflow into the well was impacted by lower hydraulic conductivity sediments with relatively high arsenic concentrations. When the well was actively pumped (dynamic conditions), the flow into the well was dominated by zones of higher hydraulic conductivity and lower arsenic concentrations which essentially diluted the arsenic being contributed by the lower hydraulic conductivity zones. In this case, they got lucky and did not really need to do anything other than make sure they pumped the initial higher arsenic water to waste when they started the pump. In other cases, unfortunately, con- centrations of naturally occurring contam- inants like arsenic and uranium exceeding the MCL can trigger a requirement for expensive treatment options, which can run into the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars for municipal systems, with perpetual annual opera- tion costs tagged onto the capital costs. The good news is, there may be a much less costly option than a treatment system. This option involves vertical pro- filing of the well to identify zones where the contaminants are present, and the loca- tion of zones which provide the greatest flow contribution to the well. If the vertical profiling determines a zone contributing contaminants to the well does not con- tribute significantly to the production capac- ity of the well, a recommendation can made for well modifications which involves sealing off those high-contaminant zones. In many cases, these well modifications can eliminate, or at least reduce, the need for expensive treatment plants. There are a number of different approaches to profiling wells out there, and some techniques may work better in some geologic environments or well types than others. In all cases, though, the profiling should be able to identify the contaminant zones in the well, the most productive water-producing zones, be able to determine whether well modifica- tions can be made without impacting well production, and calculate the levels of contaminants in the well after well modifications are made. Tom michele@ worldwidedrillingresource.com Serving as an Advocate and Resource for the Groundwater Industry Since 1992 To register call Josh McClintock: (405) 258-8747 or go online: www.okgroundwater.org Don't miss the only conference dedicated to Oklahoma's groundwater industry. Joinover 200waterwell drillers, pump installers,manufacturers and suppliers, technical and groundwater professionals from across Oklahoma and beyond. Continuing Education Opportunities Access to Exhibitor Hall Lunch Buffet with Trade Show Evening Reception Networking Opportunities January 8 & 9, 2019 Embassy Suites Hotel & Conference Center Norman, OK 2019 OGWA Conference and Trade Show 21 WorldWide Drilling Resource ® NOVEMBER 2018 WTR